From e6f8d5e66ab0feedaf3daa6736dcaf3caaaff00c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: compudj <compudj@04897980-b3bd-0310-b5e0-8ef037075253>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:24:01 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] ust update

git-svn-id: http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn@3242 04897980-b3bd-0310-b5e0-8ef037075253
---
 trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html b/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
index 02f2f3fa..b607f818 100644
--- a/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
+++ b/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
@@ -52,5 +52,12 @@ perform both dynamic and static user-space tracing. Performance comparison of
 a function call vs the int3 approach is available at
 <a href="http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2006-q3/msg00793.html">Markers vs
 int3 performance comparison</a> (see "Conclusion").
+
+Tracing of Java application is planned to be done through a JNI interface.
+Linking standard low-level C tracing library to the application within a JNI
+adaptation class will be required to trace Java events. This has been prototyped
+in the past. The work is available here for older LTTng versions : <a
+href="http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn/trunk/attic/ltt-usertrace/java/"</a>
+
   </body>
 </html>
-- 
2.34.1