From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 11:37:09 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: Fix: workqueue: struct urcu_work vs rcu_head mixup
X-Git-Tag: v0.10.2~4
X-Git-Url: https://git.lttng.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9e19a6b0d350ffb70e9f29d8eea371c6b7ffad72;p=urcu.git

Fix: workqueue: struct urcu_work vs rcu_head mixup

The workqueue code was derived from call-rcu, and its API
expects a struct urcu_work for work items, but it internally iterates
over struct rcu_head.

This is not an issue at runtime because both structures have the
exact same layout and content, but it is a type mixup nevertheless.

Use the right type in the implementation.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---

diff --git a/src/workqueue.c b/src/workqueue.c
index db0c63a..6707ffe 100644
--- a/src/workqueue.c
+++ b/src/workqueue.c
@@ -221,11 +221,11 @@ static void *workqueue_thread(void *arg)
 			cbcount = 0;
 			__cds_wfcq_for_each_blocking_safe(&cbs_tmp_head,
 					&cbs_tmp_tail, cbs, cbs_tmp_n) {
-				struct rcu_head *rhp;
+				struct urcu_work *uwp;
 
-				rhp = caa_container_of(cbs,
-					struct rcu_head, next);
-				rhp->func(rhp);
+				uwp = caa_container_of(cbs,
+					struct urcu_work, next);
+				uwp->func(uwp);
 				cbcount++;
 			}
 			uatomic_sub(&workqueue->qlen, cbcount);