From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:22:03 +0000 (-0400)
Subject: Return -EEXIST when the old cpu call_rcu_data has not been removed
X-Git-Tag: v0.6.5~14
X-Git-Url: https://git.lttng.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=53a55535da7db6ac6a2f37107baed9130c049333;p=userspace-rcu.git

Return -EEXIST when the old cpu call_rcu_data has not been removed

To make it matches the comments.

It is the caller's responsibility to use
set_cpu_call_rcu_data(cpu, NULL) to remove the CPU's
call_rcu_data structure and dispose it.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---

diff --git a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
index c822646..ae93468 100644
--- a/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
+++ b/urcu-call-rcu-impl.h
@@ -396,11 +396,19 @@ int set_cpu_call_rcu_data(int cpu, struct call_rcu_data *crdp)
 		errno = EINVAL;
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
 	if (per_cpu_call_rcu_data == NULL) {
 		call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex);
 		errno = ENOMEM;
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
+
+	if (per_cpu_call_rcu_data[cpu] != NULL && crdp != NULL) {
+		call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex);
+		errno = EEXIST;
+		return -EEXIST;
+	}
+
 	per_cpu_call_rcu_data[cpu] = crdp;
 	call_rcu_unlock(&call_rcu_mutex);
 	return 0;