From: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 22:10:22 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Fix: SWITCH_FLUSH new sub-buffer checks X-Git-Tag: v2.3.0-rc1~13 X-Git-Url: https://git.lttng.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5334a2c5a8a4d72e7662bd132de550116c66a1ec;p=lttng-modules.git Fix: SWITCH_FLUSH new sub-buffer checks The SWITCH_FLUSH, when performed on a completely empty sub-buffer, was missing some checks (imported from space reservation). Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- diff --git a/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_frontend.c b/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_frontend.c index 22cc62fc..6b92193d 100644 --- a/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_frontend.c +++ b/lib/ringbuffer/ring_buffer_frontend.c @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ int lib_ring_buffer_try_switch_slow(enum switch_mode mode, u64 *tsc) { const struct lib_ring_buffer_config *config = &chan->backend.config; - unsigned long off; + unsigned long off, reserve_commit_diff; offsets->begin = v_read(config, &buf->offset); offsets->old = offsets->begin; @@ -1409,36 +1409,68 @@ int lib_ring_buffer_try_switch_slow(enum switch_mode mode, * (records and header timestamps) are visible to the reader. This is * required for quiescence guarantees for the fusion merge. */ - if (mode == SWITCH_FLUSH || off > 0) { - if (unlikely(off == 0)) { - /* - * A final flush that encounters an empty - * sub-buffer cannot switch buffer if a - * reader is located within this sub-buffer. - * Anyway, the purpose of final flushing of a - * sub-buffer at offset 0 is to handle the case - * of entirely empty stream. - */ - if (unlikely(subbuf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan) - - subbuf_trunc((unsigned long) - atomic_long_read(&buf->consumed), chan) - >= chan->backend.buf_size)) - return -1; - /* - * The client does not save any header information. - * Don't switch empty subbuffer on finalize, because it - * is invalid to deliver a completely empty subbuffer. - */ - if (!config->cb.subbuffer_header_size()) + if (mode != SWITCH_FLUSH && !off) + return -1; /* we do not have to switch : buffer is empty */ + + if (unlikely(off == 0)) { + unsigned long sb_index, commit_count; + + /* + * We are performing a SWITCH_FLUSH. At this stage, there are no + * concurrent writes into the buffer. + * + * The client does not save any header information. Don't + * switch empty subbuffer on finalize, because it is invalid to + * deliver a completely empty subbuffer. + */ + if (!config->cb.subbuffer_header_size()) + return -1; + + /* Test new buffer integrity */ + sb_index = subbuf_index(offsets->begin, chan); + commit_count = v_read(config, + &buf->commit_cold[sb_index].cc_sb); + reserve_commit_diff = + (buf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan) + >> chan->backend.num_subbuf_order) + - (commit_count & chan->commit_count_mask); + if (likely(reserve_commit_diff == 0)) { + /* Next subbuffer not being written to. */ + if (unlikely(config->mode != RING_BUFFER_OVERWRITE && + subbuf_trunc(offsets->begin, chan) + - subbuf_trunc((unsigned long) + atomic_long_read(&buf->consumed), chan) + >= chan->backend.buf_size)) { + /* + * We do not overwrite non consumed buffers + * and we are full : don't switch. + */ return -1; + } else { + /* + * Next subbuffer not being written to, and we + * are either in overwrite mode or the buffer is + * not full. It's safe to write in this new + * subbuffer. + */ + } + } else { /* - * Need to write the subbuffer start header on finalize. + * Next subbuffer reserve offset does not match the + * commit offset. Don't perform switch in + * producer-consumer and overwrite mode. Caused by + * either a writer OOPS or too many nested writes over a + * reserve/commit pair. */ - offsets->switch_old_start = 1; + return -1; } - offsets->begin = subbuf_align(offsets->begin, chan); - } else - return -1; /* we do not have to switch : buffer is empty */ + + /* + * Need to write the subbuffer start header on finalize. + */ + offsets->switch_old_start = 1; + } + offsets->begin = subbuf_align(offsets->begin, chan); /* Note: old points to the next subbuf at offset 0 */ offsets->end = offsets->begin; return 0;