From: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:36:43 +0000 (-0500) Subject: rculfhash: add assertions on node alignment X-Git-Tag: v0.8.0~109 X-Git-Url: https://git.lttng.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2f943cd7ef7e14ddd9dfc6c8a98db798c460eb33;p=userspace-rcu.git rculfhash: add assertions on node alignment I've had a report of someone running into issues with the RCU lock-free hash table by embedding the struct cds_lfht_node into a packed structure by mistake, thus not respecting alignment requirements stated in urcu/rculfhash.h. Assertions on "replace" and "add" operations should catch this, but I notice that we should add assertions on the REMOVAL_OWNER_FLAG to cover all possible misalignments. Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers --- diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c index 8c3d621..e0be7df 100644 --- a/rculfhash.c +++ b/rculfhash.c @@ -833,13 +833,16 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod assert(!is_bucket(bucket)); assert(!is_removed(bucket)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(bucket)); assert(!is_bucket(node)); assert(!is_removed(node)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(node)); for (;;) { iter_prev = bucket; /* We can always skip the bucket node initially */ iter = rcu_dereference(iter_prev->next); assert(!is_removed(iter)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(iter)); assert(iter_prev->reverse_hash <= node->reverse_hash); /* * We should never be called with bucket (start of chain) @@ -860,6 +863,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_gc_bucket(struct cds_lfht_node *bucket, struct cds_lfht_node *nod iter = next; } assert(!is_removed(iter)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(iter)); if (is_bucket(iter)) new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next)); else @@ -880,8 +884,10 @@ int _cds_lfht_replace(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long size, return -ENOENT; assert(!is_removed(old_node)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(old_node)); assert(!is_bucket(old_node)); assert(!is_removed(new_node)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(new_node)); assert(!is_bucket(new_node)); assert(new_node != old_node); for (;;) { @@ -956,6 +962,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht, assert(!is_bucket(node)); assert(!is_removed(node)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(node)); bucket = lookup_bucket(ht, size, hash); for (;;) { uint32_t chain_len = 0; @@ -1016,7 +1023,9 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht, insert: assert(node != clear_flag(iter)); assert(!is_removed(iter_prev)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(iter_prev)); assert(!is_removed(iter)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(iter)); assert(iter_prev != node); if (!bucket_flag) node->next = clear_flag(iter); @@ -1036,6 +1045,7 @@ void _cds_lfht_add(struct cds_lfht *ht, gc_node: assert(!is_removed(iter)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(iter)); if (is_bucket(iter)) new_next = flag_bucket(clear_flag(next)); else @@ -1700,6 +1710,7 @@ int cds_lfht_delete_bucket(struct cds_lfht *ht) if (!is_bucket(node)) return -EPERM; assert(!is_removed(node)); + assert(!is_removal_owner(node)); } while (!is_end(node)); /* * size accessed without rcu_dereference because hash table is