Fix: defer_rcu: futex wait: handle spurious futex wakeups
authorMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Wed, 22 Jun 2022 20:46:50 +0000 (16:46 -0400)
committerMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:30:17 +0000 (10:30 -0400)
Observed issue
==============

The urcu-defer wait_defer() implements a futex wait/wakeup scheme identical to
the workqueue code, which has an issue with spurious wakeups.

A spurious wakeup on wait_defer can cause wait_defer to return with a
defer_thread_futex state of -1, which is unexpected. It would cause the
following loops in thr_defer() to decrement the defer_thread_futex to
values below -1, thus actively using CPU as values will be decremented
to very low negative values until it reaches 0 through underflow, or
until callbacks are eventually queued. The state is restored to 0 when
callbacks are found, which restores the futex state to a correct state
for the following calls to wait_defer().

This issue will cause spurious unexpected high CPU use, but will not
lead to data corruption.

Cause
=====

From futex(5):

       FUTEX_WAIT
              Returns 0 if the caller was woken up.  Note that a  wake-up  can
              also  be caused by common futex usage patterns in unrelated code
              that happened to have previously used the  futex  word's  memory
              location  (e.g., typical futex-based implementations of Pthreads
              mutexes can cause this under some conditions).  Therefore, call‐
              ers should always conservatively assume that a return value of 0
              can mean a spurious wake-up, and  use  the  futex  word's  value
              (i.e.,  the user-space synchronization scheme) to decide whether
              to continue to block or not.

Solution
========

We therefore need to validate whether the value differs from -1 in
user-space after the call to FUTEX_WAIT returns 0.

Known drawbacks
===============

None.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Change-Id: Id9c104c0bb77cc306f0b8fbf0b924bdda2aaaf4c

src/urcu-defer-impl.h

index 969231f8b552aa733dc5aedd91c8fd86ece5981c..f1fae9c0d15ce4364a44d511f2a4701febe0c4b5 100644 (file)
@@ -194,17 +194,25 @@ static void wait_defer(void)
                uatomic_set(&defer_thread_futex, 0);
        } else {
                cmm_smp_rmb();  /* Read queue before read futex */
-               if (uatomic_read(&defer_thread_futex) != -1)
-                       return;
-               while (futex_noasync(&defer_thread_futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
-                               NULL, NULL, 0)) {
+               while (uatomic_read(&defer_thread_futex) == -1) {
+                       if (!futex_noasync(&defer_thread_futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL, NULL, 0)) {
+                               /*
+                                * Prior queued wakeups queued by unrelated code
+                                * using the same address can cause futex wait to
+                                * return 0 even through the futex value is still
+                                * -1 (spurious wakeups). Check the value again
+                                * in user-space to validate whether it really
+                                * differs from -1.
+                                */
+                               continue;
+                       }
                        switch (errno) {
-                       case EWOULDBLOCK:
+                       case EAGAIN:
                                /* Value already changed. */
                                return;
                        case EINTR:
                                /* Retry if interrupted by signal. */
-                               break;  /* Get out of switch. */
+                               break;  /* Get out of switch. Check again. */
                        default:
                                /* Unexpected error. */
                                urcu_die(errno);
This page took 0.026697 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.