Fix: problem in port assignment in uri_parse()

The functions now puts 0 in the port field of the lttng_uri structure if
NO port are specified. It's now the caller's job to assign a default
port for that case.

Since the uri_parse() function does not know the URI context, a default
port can not be assigned correctly.

Signed-off-by: David Goulet <dgoulet@efficios.com>

diff --git a/src/common/uri.c b/src/common/uri.c
index 3a58aedca53f95af2d8e9734eb53fd4fd5f5f4ba..cb04d1963b024f4297c85f57b717f47b40110041 100644 (file)
--- a/src/common/uri.c
+++ b/src/common/uri.c
@@ -145,17 +145,17 @@ ssize_t uri_parse(const char *str_uri, struct lttng_uri **uris)
        /* Size of the uris array. Default is 1 */
        ssize_t size = 1;
        char net[6], dst[LTTNG_MAX_DNNAME + 1];
-       unsigned int ctrl_port = DEFAULT_NETWORK_CONTROL_PORT;
-       unsigned int data_port = DEFAULT_NETWORK_DATA_PORT;
+       unsigned int ctrl_port = 0;
+       unsigned int data_port = 0;
        struct lttng_uri *uri;
        const struct uri_proto *proto;
 
        /*
         * The first part is the protocol portion of a maximum of 5 bytes for now.
-        * (tcp, tcp6, udp, udp6, file, net). The second part is the hostname or IP
-        * address. The 255 bytes size is the limit found in the RFC 1035 for the
-        * total length of a domain name (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt).
-        * Finally, with the net:// protocol, two ports can be specified.
+        * The second part is the hostname or IP address. The 255 bytes size is the
+        * limit found in the RFC 1035 for the total length of a domain name
+        * (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt). Finally, for the net://
+        * protocol, two ports CAN be specified.
         */
 
        ret = sscanf(str_uri, "%5[^:]://", net);