Fix: urcu-qsbr: futex wait: handle spurious futex wakeups
authorMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Wed, 22 Jun 2022 20:49:11 +0000 (16:49 -0400)
committerMathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 14:30:17 +0000 (10:30 -0400)
Observed issue
==============

The urcu-qsbr wait_gp() implements a futex wait/wakeup scheme identical to
the workqueue code, which has an issue with spurious wakeups.

A spurious wakeup on wait_gp can cause wait_gp to return with a
urcu_qsbr_gp.futex state of -1, which is unexpected. It would cause the
following loops in wait_for_readers() to decrement the
urcu_qsbr_gp.futex to values below -1, thus actively using CPU as values
will be decremented to very low negative values until it reaches 0
through underflow, or until the input_readers list is found to be empty.
The state is restored to 0 when the input_readers list is found to be
empty, which restores the futex state to a correct state for the
following calls to wait_for_readers().

This issue will cause spurious unexpected high CPU use, but will not
lead to data corruption.

Cause
=====

From futex(5):

       FUTEX_WAIT
              Returns 0 if the caller was woken up.  Note that a  wake-up  can
              also  be caused by common futex usage patterns in unrelated code
              that happened to have previously used the  futex  word's  memory
              location  (e.g., typical futex-based implementations of Pthreads
              mutexes can cause this under some conditions).  Therefore, call‐
              ers should always conservatively assume that a return value of 0
              can mean a spurious wake-up, and  use  the  futex  word's  value
              (i.e.,  the user-space synchronization scheme) to decide whether
              to continue to block or not.

Solution
========

We therefore need to validate whether the value differs from -1 in
user-space after the call to FUTEX_WAIT returns 0.

Known drawbacks
===============

None.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Change-Id: I87f7cd3b02820cefe850c3bdb8da27fb2f9be9b2

src/urcu-qsbr.c

index 3709412f2519ff7259da6bb144f9818584842580..5572d39da65f1030510274b0618e301e893cfbcd 100644 (file)
@@ -125,17 +125,25 @@ static void wait_gp(void)
 {
        /* Read reader_gp before read futex */
        cmm_smp_rmb();
-       if (uatomic_read(&urcu_qsbr_gp.futex) != -1)
-               return;
-       while (futex_noasync(&urcu_qsbr_gp.futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1,
-                       NULL, NULL, 0)) {
+       while (uatomic_read(&urcu_qsbr_gp.futex) == -1) {
+               if (!futex_noasync(&urcu_qsbr_gp.futex, FUTEX_WAIT, -1, NULL, NULL, 0)) {
+                       /*
+                        * Prior queued wakeups queued by unrelated code
+                        * using the same address can cause futex wait to
+                        * return 0 even through the futex value is still
+                        * -1 (spurious wakeups). Check the value again
+                        * in user-space to validate whether it really
+                        * differs from -1.
+                        */
+                       continue;
+               }
                switch (errno) {
-               case EWOULDBLOCK:
+               case EAGAIN:
                        /* Value already changed. */
                        return;
                case EINTR:
                        /* Retry if interrupted by signal. */
-                       break;  /* Get out of switch. */
+                       break;  /* Get out of switch. Check again. */
                default:
                        /* Unexpected error. */
                        urcu_die(errno);
This page took 0.026828 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.