From: compudj <compudj@04897980-b3bd-0310-b5e0-8ef037075253>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:19:46 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: ust update
X-Git-Tag: v0.12.20~248
X-Git-Url: http://git.lttng.org./?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=inline;h=9dd3d20dcc9a5614a14ad0d0cd45581b0bf24cae;p=lttv.git

ust update

git-svn-id: http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn@3241 04897980-b3bd-0310-b5e0-8ef037075253
---

diff --git a/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html b/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
index 3fb0c444..02f2f3fa 100644
--- a/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
+++ b/trunk/lttv/doc/developer/ust.html
@@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ crashing). Such notification may be obtained through utrace.
 This tracing scheme plans to use a direct function call to tracing into buffers
 mapped in user-space. This should be an order of magnitude faster than the
 current Dtrace implementation (c.f.
-https://ltt.polymtl.ca/tracingwiki/index.php/DTrace) which uses a breakpoint to
+<a href="http://ltt.polymtl.ca/tracingwiki/index.php/DTrace">Dtrace information
+on the TracingWiki</a>) which uses a breakpoint to
 perform both dynamic and static user-space tracing. Performance comparison of
 a function call vs the int3 approach is available at
-http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2006-q3/msg00793.html (see "Conclusion").
+<a href="http://sourceware.org/ml/systemtap/2006-q3/msg00793.html">Markers vs
+int3 performance comparison</a> (see "Conclusion").
   </body>
 </html>